GM FYI Blog

Celebrating the GM car culture.

GM Blogs

A Commitment to Improving the Environment: GM Becomes First Automotive Company to Join USCAP

By Beth Lowery

Energy Diversity what does it really mean? It means broadening our energy sources in as many ways as possible. GM is committed to making that easier for you. We have more truck and car models that run on E85 biofuels than any other company in the world. We have several brands of hybrids on the road. We are committed to the development of the Chevy Volt, a plug-in hybrid that could mean you will never buy gas again. And we plan to develop hydrogen fuel cell technology that is viable and affordable.


We strongly believe in demonstrating our commitment to energy diversity. For example, GM, along with Ford and DaimlerChrylser, has committed to make half of our annual vehicle production bio-fuel capable by 2012, provided there is continued growth in the infrastructure to support these production volumes. If all of the E-85 capable vehicles on the road today—including those that GM, Ford, and DaimlerChrysler have already committed to produce over the next 10 years—were to run on E-85, we could displace 22 billion gallons of gasoline annually. And, if all manufacturers made the same commitment, we could increase the savings to 37 billion gallons of gasoline annually. That’s more than quadruple the savings that some current CAFE increase proposals by the Administration and Congress would achieve—and enough to actually reduce America’s oil consumption by more than 10 percent versus today’s levels, and CO2 emissions, as well.

In addition to our technology investments, we are addressing other ways to be part of the solution. Today, we are taking a bold step toward that goal by becoming the first automaker to join the United States Climate Action Partnership (USCAP). USCAP is a group of environmental and business groups that are asking the federal government to pass laws requiring a reduction in greenhouse gases. Our group wants a comprehensive reduction in carbon output from all of the major emitting sectors of the economy. The solutions can vary between industries, with an emphasis on advanced technology. The key is, the more contributors there are, the more dramatic the impact.

Critics may respond by charging that GM is simply trying to make this someone else’s problem. Quite the opposite. We are saying, the old approach of isolating one industry is ineffective and short sighted. Innovative, broad-based solutions are called for if we want to proactively make a difference. USCAP moves in that direction – all for one, one for all.

This partnership - with such groups as Environmental Defense and the Natural Resources Defense Council - may come as a surprise to some. But it shouldn’t.

GM has long been on the cutting edge of technology, and we see this coalition as a triple win. First, we work to bring technology forward and reinvent the car’s DNA – how it is powered, controlled and driven. That leads to breakthroughs, which ultimately reduces greenhouse gases through energy diversity. Better technology, better cars, better environment. We are committed on all fronts.

2 Comments

  • May 8th, 2007 at 4:36 pm

    Matt

    I’m a big fan of the Volt and the E-Flex platform–that’s exactly where the auto industry needs to go from here. But let’s be careful with our investment in new technologies in vehicles. FlexFuel vehicles mostly displace oil consumption and greenhouse gas production, rather than reducing them. Our ethanol is produced mainly from corn sugar, which is grown using fertilizers and machinery made using and powered by fossil fuels. And FlexFuel vehicles do not use E85 efficiently; they get significantly worse mileage on E85 than with gasoline, preventing us from realizing the potential environmental gains of ethanol.

    What about building biofuel-specific cars with high-compression engines, taking advantage of the high octane of E85? Build us a 1.0L E85 engine that makes 200hp and gets 40 miles to the E85 gallon. If you can do this, there’s a future for ethanol, and I agree that FFVs are a bridge to that future while we build an ethanol infrastructure. If you don’t plan to make more efficient engines to run on ethanol, there’s no point in building the infrastructure, and FFVs are a waste of time.

  • May 10th, 2007 at 7:01 pm

    Jason Zebersky

    This is exactly the right thing to do at the right time, gives GM credibility as a modern and viable player in this industry.
    Must get the battery technology right, it’s smart to wait.
    er um, uh and do what Matt says.

Leave a Reply

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

To protect against spam, off-topic and abusive comments, all comments are reviewed before being posted to the blog. Please limit your comments to two on each topic and don't use all caps. Also, please note that some comments related to specific ownership issues are forwarded to customer assistance rather than posted here.